User avatar
Erin Rose @ErinRose@chaos.social
1w
tbh someone needs to write a “if your company can trivially afford to not rely on my unpaid labour then you can’t use this” open source hardware license
5
1
1
0
User avatar
mirabilos🐈‍⬛ @mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
1w
@ErinRose would not be open source
2
0
0
0
User avatar
Lyn coweat verifiedlesbian @fugi@amazonawaws.com
1w
@mirabilos @ErinRose yes it would, but not "Free Software" in the definition of the FSF and so on.
1
0
1
0
User avatar
mirabilos🐈‍⬛ @mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org
1w
@fugi @ErinRose no, it would not be (OSD#6, Copyfree#1, DFSG#6, …)
1
0
0
0
User avatar
Lyn coweat verifiedlesbian @fugi@amazonawaws.com
1w
@mirabilos @ErinRose It depends on one's definition of "Open Source". Neither of those you cite is technically authoritative, and the whole "let's call it free/libre instead" movement exists precisely because one popular interpretation of "open source" is just what it says, the source is open.
0
0
1
0