User avatar
amy neobot_flag_transbianneobot_flag_polyam @thing@thegayagenda.fans
1mo
does anyone know abt any tui (code/text) editors that have lsp support?
edit: do not suggest helix to me, it's slop.
5
0
0
0
User avatar
flori_ava_star:~cursor_blinking made-with-estrogen verifiedlesbian @star@amazonawaws.com
1mo
ai/llms @thing i think calling helix slop is a bit over the top, but most certainly not a very helpful descriptor. out of over 7700 commits made in the lifetime of helix, a singular one, made on march 14th, was co-authored by claude. yeah, it sucks that that happened, but i really do not think that this makes the entirety of helix "slop"
Screenshot of a terminal window with a light-purple background. It shows the following text: git log --all -i --grep="Co-authored-by: .*claude" commit 22d0d294bdb2e8f90fd6cb6f2546aefe2844e642 Author: shotarokuramata <104685301+shotarokuramata@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat Mar 14 23:26:56 2026 +0900 perf(completers): use DirEntry::file_type() instead of metadata() (#15433) `DirEntry::file_type()` uses the `d_type` field from `readdir` on Linux, avoiding a per-entry `lstat` syscall that `DirEntry::metadata()` requires. Behavior is unchanged as both return symlink-aware file type information without following symlinks. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> ❯ git log --all -i --grep="Co-authored-by: .*copilot" the latter command returned no results.
3
0
3
0
User avatar
stilic @stilic@social.oss.zone
1mo
ai/llms @star @thing Can we stop finding excuses to reduce this as if it was insignificant?
If we were able to work on our software without any LLM from the beginning, there's no reason to allow even a single commit to pass through
This is how most projects are becoming more welcoming of LLMs, let's not get fooled
:neobot_heart_cyan@thegayagenda.fans:1
1
0
0
1
User avatar
flori_ava_star:~cursor_blinking made-with-estrogen verifiedlesbian @star@amazonawaws.com
1mo
ai/llms @stilic @thing It is actually pretty insignificant, yes
2
0
0
0
User avatar
flori_ava_star:~cursor_blinking made-with-estrogen verifiedlesbian @star@amazonawaws.com
1mo
ai/llms @stilic @thing And this is also not how projects become more accepting of LLMs

It's how discussion gets sparked around this happening, and it engages individuals to push for a policy which bans this from happening. And the fact that that is happening is good! But in the terms of the quality of the software? A single commit of regular size being co-authored by an LLM is largely insignificant. What is significant, in my opinion, is making nuanced discussions about the topic as a whole very hard by conflating and calling things names in a way that doesn't help anyone or anything
1
0
0
0
User avatar
flori_ava_star:~cursor_blinking made-with-estrogen verifiedlesbian @star@amazonawaws.com
1mo
ai/llms @stilic @thing I mean, who the hell does it help to call things "slop" that have obviously been created with more hard work and dedication than a lot of us have ever put into anything? It's extremely important to criticize the usage of AI here and everywhere else, and I think it is extremely valid to be upset about this happening and make that heard! That's how change actually happens! But just calling something "slop" and moving on isn't at all how you create change. It's how you alienate those you are trying to bring to your side
2
1
0
0
User avatar
amy neobot_flag_transbianneobot_flag_polyam @thing@thegayagenda.fans
1mo
ai/llms @star @stilic fine. ok then.

but if one more commit happens there's no excuse. i'm never coming back if that happens.
0
0
0
0
User avatar
stilic @stilic@social.oss.zone
1mo
ai/llms @star @thing If there are other projects that did the right choice already, there's a point at which it becomes tiring to have the benefit of doubt towards those that didn't worry about it yet
This isn't an unknown phenomenon anymore, we have to act now, and not by letting a commit (yes, even one, even if it's just "coauthored by <llm>") of that kind enter their Git repository
1
0
0
0
User avatar
stilic @stilic@social.oss.zone
1mo
ai/llms @star @thing I'm just not in the mood to give chances there and there anymore
If they weren't able to deal with the problem already, they must live under a rock
I kept dealing with projects where the devs are barely willing to do it in good faith for the users
It has gotten to a point where the project doubled down on its original decision, fully embraced LLMs and openly criticize those against their move (see: the Limine situation)
0
0
0
0