ai/llms
@stilic @thing And this is also not how projects become more accepting of LLMsIt's how discussion gets sparked around this happening, and it engages individuals to push for a policy which bans this from happening. And the fact that that is happening is good! But in the terms of the quality of the software? A single commit of regular size being co-authored by an LLM is largely insignificant. What is significant, in my opinion, is making nuanced discussions about the topic as a whole very hard by conflating and calling things names in a way that doesn't help anyone or anything