User avatar
flori_ava_star:~cursor_blinking made-with-estrogen verifiedlesbian @star@amazonawaws.com
4mo
Need me a self-hosted code coverage frontend/tool which also checks for patch coverage and can be integrated into a forgejo action somehow
:neofox_heart@sharkey.skydevs.me:1
1
5
10
1
User avatar
Lilly heart_transgender @lilly@mstd.ink
4mo
@star Sonarqube would be an option I guess, but that would need a lot of setup.
1
0
1
0
User avatar
flori_ava_star:~cursor_blinking made-with-estrogen verifiedlesbian @star@amazonawaws.com
4mo
@lilly Im not sure they are compatible with gitea/forgejo(?)
1
0
2
0
User avatar
Lilly heart_transgender @lilly@mstd.ink
4mo
@star well they have a cli wich reports to the instance, so as long as it can run a docker container it can run the cli. I don't know if gitea/... has their own display for coverage. If so that would be harder to extract. But as I said Sonarqube is also a pain to get running and configured. (in my experience)
1
0
2
0
User avatar
Lyn@GPN24 📞 ACOW @fugi@amazonawaws.com
4mo
@lilly @star I once set up a local sonarqube in docker for a uni thing (their instance only checked the main branch, so was not that useful for us). I don't remember it as that complicated to set up tbh, but it was a few years ago so idk
1
0
2
0
User avatar
Lilly heart_transgender @lilly@mstd.ink
4mo
@fugi @star the main issue for me was always to get the reports to run correctly and to do what I want them to do. Especially with some more exotic stups.
1
0
1
0
User avatar
flori_ava_star:~cursor_blinking made-with-estrogen verifiedlesbian @star@amazonawaws.com
4mo
@lilly @fugi They also now have a bunch of AI stuff apparently, which I am not a fan of
0
0
3
0