User avatar
celeste_hearts_lesbian celeste_hearts_trans celeste_hearts_demisexual flori_ava_star@[matrix]conf:~cursor_blinking @star@amazonawaws.com
1w
if you use MD5 or SHA1 for literally ANYTHING in 2026, STOP. GET SOME HELP. DO NOT
:drgn_heart@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net:1:neocat_boop_cute@transfem.social:1:neofox_sob@mk.absturztau.be:1❤️4
13
12
37
7
User avatar
Yureka ✨ @yuka@fedi.yuka.dev
1w
@star I use sha1 all the time, I’m sure you do too looks at the git repos 🙃
1
0
1
0
User avatar
celeste_hearts_lesbian celeste_hearts_trans celeste_hearts_demisexual flori_ava_star@[matrix]conf:~cursor_blinking @star@amazonawaws.com
1w
@yuka ACTUALLY git 3.0 will make sha256 the default iirc :3
1
0
1
0
User avatar
ciara @doti@pl.catboyindustries.co
1w
@star @yuka perhaps this is a stupid question but isn’t blake way more efficient is there a reason people aren’t using it(?)
1
0
0
0
User avatar
celeste_hearts_lesbian celeste_hearts_trans celeste_hearts_demisexual flori_ava_star@[matrix]conf:~cursor_blinking @star@amazonawaws.com
1w
@doti @yuka blake is a much faster hashing algorithm, yes. But I guess sha is much more widely known, adopted and its security profile has thus also been evaluated much more thoroughly than blakes, and for something like git where this choice you make now has to still be respected 10, 15, 20 years from now, that might be more important
1
0
1
0
User avatar
ciara @doti@pl.catboyindustries.co
1w
@star @yuka yea that’s kinda what i was thinking. maybe in 2048
1
0
1
0
User avatar
celeste_hearts_lesbian celeste_hearts_trans celeste_hearts_demisexual flori_ava_star@[matrix]conf:~cursor_blinking @star@amazonawaws.com
1w
@doti @yuka i use blake3 in projects where i want a fast hashing algorithm! ^-^
0
0
1
0