User avatar
Niccolò Venerandi @niccolove@fosstodon.org
1y
please don't do these things :-/
5
0
1
0
User avatar
Escapistes aroaceheart @escapistes@neopaquita.es
1y
@niccolove exactly, why?
1
0
1
0
User avatar
Niccolò Venerandi @niccolove@fosstodon.org
1y
@escapistes hyprland is not fascist. Ladybird being fascist is IMO very debatable. But on the whole, the idea of having your OS itself tell you not to use software for political reason is not going to work in our favor and, if done in an hyperbolic way like this, it will make the left look really dumb
1
0
1
0
User avatar
minwlfNotice flori_ava_star~cursor_blinking @star@amazonawaws.com
1mo
FOSS, politics, fascism @niccolove @escapistes Says who, you? Based on what? You do realize that basically every distro that KDE ships on, packaged with Calamares, asks you whether you would like to allow unfree software. That is precisely and fundamentally a political choice, and excluding software based on policy and politics.

It's been 11 months but I can't really see that you have changed your mind since then. That's quite sad, because I used to be inspired by you.
1
3
10
0
User avatar
Henning @hen@berlin.social
1mo
re: FOSS, politics, fascism @star

Lol software licenses are not political, they are technical / legal and maybe ownership/privacy related.
1
0
0
0
User avatar
minwlfNotice flori_ava_star~cursor_blinking @star@amazonawaws.com
1mo
re: FOSS, politics, fascism @hen <sarcasm>You're right, I wonder what to call a thing that decides the standards of legality, ownership and privacy for a populace. Maybe... politics could be a good name?
0
0
0
0